The homeowner of this unit in Mount Hawthorn had two major issues with the performance of her home;
- Noise travelled from the neighbour’s adjoining unit too easily and;
- The unit was extremely hot in the afternoons, especially the westerly facing wall.
Prior to offering a solution, Michael and the team had inspected the roof insulation. There currently was existing R4.1 batts, as well as Anticon-60 under the tin roofing sheets. After running an energy assessment (using NatHERS), it was deemed that any more ceiling or roof insulation would not increase the internal temperature of the home.
After running a NathHERS Assessment to identify the best way to reduce the internal temperature in the heat and increase the passive design of the home, we came to the following solutions;
1. Cavity Wall insulation to the external westerly facing wall would increase the thermal resistance of the wall from R0.4 rating to R1.72. This was significant when the layout of the home meant that the westerly facing wall alone was responsible for up to 40% of the heat transfer in the home.
2. Rockwool (Sound Shield) cavity wall insulation between the adjoining units would reduce sound vibrations travelling between units.
Choosing the Right Cavity Wall Insulation
When recommending the best cavity wall insulator to use, we compared InsulGuard Cavity Shield against Sound Shield.
Thermal Performance: Both products offer roughly a R1.3 rated insulation for a 50mm cavity.
Installation: Cavity Shield would involve no drilling and be installed from the top of the cavity, whilst Sound Shield would involve drilling approximately every 1.5m internally.
Soundproofing: The density of the rockwool in Sound Shield makes it a superior acoustic insulator compared with the polystyrene Cavity Shield.
Verdict: Sound Shield
Whilst a more invasive process of installation with drilling internally (which requires patching and painting), the client’s priority was the soundproofing between the apartments when both products had a similar thermal performance.